http://www.iarw.org/irta_new/Cool_Moves/Images/MAST.jpg

Attachment to
Cool Moves
September 2007

In This Issue

·    U.S. Government: More Food Safety Initiatives

Subscribe

The monthly Cool Moves can be sent to any employee or customer of a member company.  Contact Sara Martin to add to or delete from the mailing list.

Learn More Online

www.IRTA.org

IRTA Report Archives

Membership Benefits

Contact Us

IRTA Headquarters

1500 King Street, Suite 201
Alexandria, VA 22314 USA

703 373 4300
703 373 4301 fax

email@irta.org

 

U.S. Government: More Food Safety Initiatives

There are more food safety initiatives floating around Washington now* than at any time in history and following a series of recent food scares the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) appears more willing to seek additional authority to regulate food safety than they have in many years. 

Assistant FDA Commissioner David Acheson told a House subcommittee this week that his agency lacks needed authority over matters of food safety, a position the FDA has not taken in a very long while. The FDA is considering several plans and expects to propose new legislation asking for more authority within the next few weeks. Any request is apt to include components to prevent contamination, to utilize risk-based inspections, and to provide faster response times.

The FDA announcement comes as Congressional Democrats are showing impatience with what they consider to be the Bush administration's lack of action to strengthen the nation's food-safety system. Among other things, they point to the Department of Health and Human Services, parent agency of FDA, and its rejection, earlier this year, of an FDA proposal to regulate produce. Democrats have proposed fixing the system through such measures as establishing a single-food agency, giving the FDA new recall authority, and allowing the agency to charge importers user fees to fund food inspection.

The most recent Democratic initiative came this week in a proposal from Rep. John Dingell (D-MI). The Dingell bill (H.R.3610) would channel all imported food and drugs through 13 ports of entry and assess importers $500 million in fees with which to fund FDA inspections on incoming shipments of these products. The Dingell bill would also restrict food imports to countries or facilities that meet U.S. safety standards, require all food and drugs to be labeled by country of origin, and give FDA the power to mandate food recalls.

No one can predict what will happen with the Dingell proposal, although it drew sharp criticism from industry and government officials in Chicago, Houston, Miami and other cities which could be shut out of the food and pharmaceutical trade. The FDA has yet to take a position on the bill, and a cabinet-level group set up by President Bush is not expected to present its own import safety plan before November.

---------------------

*Related legislation includes:

1. Imported Food Security Act of 2007 [S.1776]

2. Human and Pet Food Safety Act of 2007 [S.1274] [H.R.2108]

3. Consumer Food Safety Act of 2007 [H.R.3624];

4. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007

5. Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act [S.1082]

6. Assured Food Safety Act of 2007 [H.R.2997]

7. Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2008  [H.R.2638]

8. Safe Food Act of 2007 [S.654] [H.R.1148]

 

Copyright © 2007 IRTA.  All rights reserved.